Western culture is littered with tiny subversions. One of the most obnoxious to this author is the notion of the "bad girl" as a celebrated cultural institution. The harm in this meme is evident as soon as you bother to ask, "what makes a girl bad?" A girl is bad when she sleeps around, acts like a bitch, has zero respect for authority or tradition, lies habitually, and generally annoys and/or harms every person she contacts. If you want a bad girl, there's a good chance you'll end up with one.
On the other hand, bad boys/men generally fall into the more ambiguous category between legality and moral righteousness. A bad man/rebel/Byronic hero generally exemplifies a code of personal honor which dictates how much force, if any, he applies to the world. This type of man also tends to have more trouble staying single than finding a good woman. If you're a male struggling in the world, you'd better identify your moral code and spend more effort developing it than finding pussy. If you earn women's respect, their sexuality will follow. If you chase pussy and lose women's respect, you'll have neither.
Be aware that the man of true moral refinement is not usually celebrated in the broader culture. To truly be a good man, you may need to be seen as a bad one.
Showing posts with label Sexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sexuality. Show all posts
Friday, July 24, 2015
Monday, February 2, 2015
Racial Cuckoldry and the Pathetic European Female
A cursory view of contemporary popular media shows a distinct self annihilating tendency among women of European descent. Media that would elicit immediate social reproach only 50 years ago is today apathetically overlooked. Of course, the ubiquity of attacks against the dignity of European American people is by design: sometimes the most obvious truths are hidden in plain sight.
Case studies:
Observe the song L.A. Love by Fergie. On the surface, it is a song about international fame, yet the settings of the song and the choice of actors in the music video reveal a distinctly provincial interest. Scenes such as a tour bus filled with white/mut women and black men rolling through the 'hood leave little room for alternative interpretation to a rank, disgusting attempt to symbolically cuckold European men. What other interpretation is available for an overtly sexual, virile, white woman who holds company exclusively with black men and mut women? What is NOT said speaks volumes. Another scene shows a white woman of the entourage comforting her white baby while Fergie rolls her eyes in disgust. In this one scene, a disgust with reproducing one's white lineage, a disgust with white babies, and the complete lack of a sense of shared obligation to future white generations is fucking obvious. Forget academic feminism as a cause of this kind of behavior by white women: Fergie probably can't read higher than a 3rd grade level. This kind of self annihilation is just human nature for a conquered class of women. Intermarriage is common between victorious soldiers and subjugated women throughout history, and L.A. Love simply demonstrates which race has won the war. L.A. and other cities are occupied territory and this song reveals the plan to transform every other white city on Earth in the exact same way. Notice that no African or Muslim cities are mentioned by name at all. If Fergie and her entourage of gangstas attempted this shit in Pakistan they would all go quietly missing. Just goes to show, the hands across America miscegenation advocates only seem to target those races most predisposed to gentleness and peace. Hence, white and Asian women have become the sexual playthings of the world while every other race of woman is left well alone.
Next, check out the degenerate Dev, and her song Kiss It. On the surface, it is a breakup song defending her choice of slutting around and castigating the offended, presumably white male, and that alone would be bad enough if the music video and choice of cameo were not so blatantly indicative of mixed race cuckoldry. Dev is shown sexually taunting her weak white ex-boyfriend by cavorting with his black replacement, Sage the Gemini. She flirts with the possibility of reconciliation, then responds with the admonition that he can kiss her ass. She also taunts his physical prowess against her new black boyfriend, saying the white man "couldn't fuck with him." Subsequent scenes tease and deny sexual access with the presumed black victor directly in the foreground... exactly where symbolic cuckoldry is best hidden.
In my sensitive liberal days, I used to see this form of media as progressive and edgy. How against the norm to replace a 'typical' dominant white male with a black one... or a woman... or a damn garden gnome. The problem with this conclusion is that progressive ideas, once accepted, become the new conservative. The two songs above demonstrate that there is nothing new about mixed race cuckoldry. In fact, it is the new normal in popular media where a love affair between degenerate white women and black men has been quietly occurring for the past 10-20 years. It's enough to make you think the defenders of white heritage were right when they talked about black men coveting white women...
White men who protest too loudly to this blatant disrespect in the media are treated as aggressive savages who will hurt and kill white women and their dusky lovers, but the reality is simpler, and more amusing. The silver lining to this situation for proud white men (yes fuckers, we still exist), is that our errant women have picked so badly among our competition that only our weakest brethren are driven to violence. The strong white men of the world are simply calling white women's bluff. Go ahead and breed indiscriminately with criminals and civilization's rejects. We will continue to breed with even better white women, raise our families, and defend our communities. To the death. You miscreants will receive much worse than our aggression. You will ultimately receive only our apathy.
Case studies:
Observe the song L.A. Love by Fergie. On the surface, it is a song about international fame, yet the settings of the song and the choice of actors in the music video reveal a distinctly provincial interest. Scenes such as a tour bus filled with white/mut women and black men rolling through the 'hood leave little room for alternative interpretation to a rank, disgusting attempt to symbolically cuckold European men. What other interpretation is available for an overtly sexual, virile, white woman who holds company exclusively with black men and mut women? What is NOT said speaks volumes. Another scene shows a white woman of the entourage comforting her white baby while Fergie rolls her eyes in disgust. In this one scene, a disgust with reproducing one's white lineage, a disgust with white babies, and the complete lack of a sense of shared obligation to future white generations is fucking obvious. Forget academic feminism as a cause of this kind of behavior by white women: Fergie probably can't read higher than a 3rd grade level. This kind of self annihilation is just human nature for a conquered class of women. Intermarriage is common between victorious soldiers and subjugated women throughout history, and L.A. Love simply demonstrates which race has won the war. L.A. and other cities are occupied territory and this song reveals the plan to transform every other white city on Earth in the exact same way. Notice that no African or Muslim cities are mentioned by name at all. If Fergie and her entourage of gangstas attempted this shit in Pakistan they would all go quietly missing. Just goes to show, the hands across America miscegenation advocates only seem to target those races most predisposed to gentleness and peace. Hence, white and Asian women have become the sexual playthings of the world while every other race of woman is left well alone.
Next, check out the degenerate Dev, and her song Kiss It. On the surface, it is a breakup song defending her choice of slutting around and castigating the offended, presumably white male, and that alone would be bad enough if the music video and choice of cameo were not so blatantly indicative of mixed race cuckoldry. Dev is shown sexually taunting her weak white ex-boyfriend by cavorting with his black replacement, Sage the Gemini. She flirts with the possibility of reconciliation, then responds with the admonition that he can kiss her ass. She also taunts his physical prowess against her new black boyfriend, saying the white man "couldn't fuck with him." Subsequent scenes tease and deny sexual access with the presumed black victor directly in the foreground... exactly where symbolic cuckoldry is best hidden.
In my sensitive liberal days, I used to see this form of media as progressive and edgy. How against the norm to replace a 'typical' dominant white male with a black one... or a woman... or a damn garden gnome. The problem with this conclusion is that progressive ideas, once accepted, become the new conservative. The two songs above demonstrate that there is nothing new about mixed race cuckoldry. In fact, it is the new normal in popular media where a love affair between degenerate white women and black men has been quietly occurring for the past 10-20 years. It's enough to make you think the defenders of white heritage were right when they talked about black men coveting white women...
White men who protest too loudly to this blatant disrespect in the media are treated as aggressive savages who will hurt and kill white women and their dusky lovers, but the reality is simpler, and more amusing. The silver lining to this situation for proud white men (yes fuckers, we still exist), is that our errant women have picked so badly among our competition that only our weakest brethren are driven to violence. The strong white men of the world are simply calling white women's bluff. Go ahead and breed indiscriminately with criminals and civilization's rejects. We will continue to breed with even better white women, raise our families, and defend our communities. To the death. You miscreants will receive much worse than our aggression. You will ultimately receive only our apathy.
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Misplaced Assumptions: Sex, Brinksmanship, and the Male Martial Artist
The Root of Female Violence
Too often, those involved in self defense do not completely consider their philosophical reasons for engaging in martial training in the first place. For example, I have seen a martial arts instructor advocate training to use a knife stab to the neck to address a grab from behind. The disparity of force represented here is enormous. It is this author's belief that the instructor was only allowed to advocate such a measure unchallenged because she is a woman. The reason she was not questioned is because most martial artists in this culture do not consider the reality of women's violence or their capacity to wield it. Even worse, most male martial artists do not consider the passive, more sexual ways women hurt men every day in this culture, nor do they plan to defend against those tactics. Therefore, it remains typical for women in western culture to advocate for exaggerated acts of incomprehensible violence in response to minor altercations (#killallmen is one example) and to use sexuality as an indirect form of violence (google Brigadier General Sinclair, an exemplary soldier, stripped of rank, humiliated, and disgraced by a single vindictive sex partner who demonstrably lied in court). Such behavior is now NORMAL to western women.
The majority of women do not believe they need martial training, nor do they typically need to physically protect themselves. That's because most violence is not used against, nor by, women. Criminal statistics bear this out too often to reiterate here. The primal power of women lies in sexuality, not physical aggression. With civilization stripped away, women survive through their sexuality, not their muscles. Countless conflicts throughout history demonstrate how powerful victors in war are rewarded by the women of the conquered men, often with the tacit acceptance of those women. Contemporary culture, as it decivilizes, has shown how women reward thugs and other violent men.
With respect to sexuality as a tool of violence, this author does not refer to broken hearts, cheating, and other forms of emotional wreckage. This author refers to literal VIOLENCE that is perpetrated through women's sexuality. Examples include women who encourage vengeance killings (among the poor), use the police state as a weapon against men they wish to victimize (among the middle class), advocate legislation which harms others (among the elite), and use lies and distortions to put a social bulls-eye on people they wish to harm (among all women). This author is continually shocked by those male martial artists who do not explicitly acknowledge or prepare for the violence of women, or speak out against it when it occurs. Considering what's at stake, men should learn to better resist passive female aggression.
When people picture a predatory criminal singling out a man for extortion of his money, most people mistakenly picture a male criminal, hunched over, with a weapon, who intends to commit violence unless that money is forcibly transferred. But what of the female predator who uses her vagina to accomplish the exact same outcome? A woman who will likely receive social, even political support for her robbery? This woman is every bit as dangerous and far more common than the male mugger. So how should a man protect himself from this enemy?
Fundamental Tactics to Resist Female Seduction/Aggression
Brinksmanship
Much like martial training teaches a man to absorb, redirect, and oppose increasing levels of physical force by an assailant, Venusian arts training, otherwise known as 'Game,' can help men absorb, redirect, and oppose increasing levels of seductive force by women. Though most game theorists use game for its practical outcome of scoring pussy, men can also learn to protect themselves from sexual predation through seduction resistance. The single most powerful training tool for male self defense against women is sexual brinksmanship.
Just as one can learn to effectively resist a man who uses violence to influence one's decisions, one can learn to effectively resist a woman who uses sexuality to influence one's decisions. Luckily, men in this culture have one of the most effective training tools imaginable: pornography. What is pornography but a collection of the sexiest possible women engaging in the sexiest possible behaviors to manipulate men into giving them money? By training to resist the seduction of women who are 10's, a man can theoretically resist the seductive advances of any woman he meets.
The method is simple.
1. Limit yourself to one orgasm per day. When you have this orgasm, it can be accomplished through fantasy or sex only. No pornographic pictures or videos allowed. The rest of the day, when tempted by pornography, watch freely, but spend no money, and do not orgasm. Masturbate to the point of 'throbbing' 4 times, then stop watching. Go do something productive. Repeat this process as necessary, then manually orgasm only 1 time or have sex before bed, without visual aid.
2. Visualize denying porn actresses your sperm. You are regaining control of your sperm back from women. When this becomes easy, visualize denying the women around you your sperm unless they have earned it. This will increase your confidence and reinforce a healthier attitude toward sex that values your fundamental worth as a person. You will begin to have better standards for female behavior, make better choices in relationships, and set firmer boundaries. You will also become more selective and demanding in the bedroom, an attribute psychologically healthy women will appreciate.
3. For best results in brinksmanship, use a time when your work for the day is done, or as a brief break.
4. At first, use a highly sexually charged, flirtacious softcore type of pornography which closely simulates natural female seduction. Videos of twerking, dirty talk, bodily display, and other suggestive videos are best. Masturbating to videos of penetrative sex are actually counterproductive as they encourage a man to take the subconscious role of cuckold. Eventually, you will be able to practice without visual aids using fantasy alone. At this point, you will reach a state of 'masculine presence' where attractive women stimulate you, but do not modify your behavior. If you feel inclined to ask whether you're there yet, you aren't.
At this point in your development, women you know will begin to separate into two categories: 1. Good women who sense your control, respect you, and want to earn your sperm by winning your favor, and 2. Evil women who feel entitled to your lust and will attack you for your autonomy. By increasing your sexual power in this way, you will simultaneously draw in good women and enrage evil women. Use brinksmanship to further steel yourself against manipulation by both. Both types of women will attempt to overcome your resistance in two different ways. A good woman will attempt to win your sperm and your exclusivity while an evil woman will attempt to manipulate you into giving favors and masturbatory tributes whilst simultaneously rejecting your advances and denying you access to any better women. Both types of women want your exclusive attention, but only one type will pleasure you on command and follow your lead.
Other benefits of brinksmanship include: a more satisfying and autonomous sex life, greater comfort while interacting with attractive women, a more balanced appreciation for attractive women without the predatory feelings which accompany unrestrained lust, greater feelings of bliss and peace due to a calm stream of endorphins which do not crash in the calamitous wave of orgasm, greater amounts of sperm per orgasm, harder erections, and less symptoms of erectile dysfunction in healthy men.
Distance, Preemptive Recording, and Legal Representation
When you suspect a woman has singled you out or might single you out as a social target for violence, you must react quickly using three tactics: distance, preemptive recording, and legal representation. Your financial security will influence which tactics are available to you.
If you suspect lower class violence of the vigilante sort due to false claims of rape, violated honor, etc., make any sort of distance you can from that woman. Do not answer calls, do not stay in the same city, get away. Your brinksmanship training will make this easier. Your life is in possible danger and you must react accordingly. A man does not ever fight a single woman. He fights both her and the mob of men who will do violence for her approval. No one ever asks the lynching victim for their side of the story. Simply get away. Time may disperse the mob, but they will always remember you as a social target for violence. Count your losses and leave town if you are singled out for mob violence.
If you suspect the more middle class, civilized variant of this mobbing, begin recording every interaction you have with this woman. Continue to avoid calls and interactions, but also be ready to record any attempt she makes to reinitiate contact. She will try to contact you as a means of creating conflict so she can make you seem hostile to others. Remain calm and record everything. This will help you later when she inevitably calls the police to take you away. Do not speak to the police or the woman, though you can show the police recordings as long as they do not seem likely to destroy or confiscate them. Just record everything and save it all for the courtroom.
If you suspect character assassination as a successful man, you must, whenever possible, enlist the services of an attorney. Be ready at all times to preemptively sue women who seem likely to attack your character. Make distance, record everything, and additionally hire legal counsel to financially attack predatory women who wish to harm you. At the elite level, everyone will be recording YOU as well. Make sure you enjoy your vices over secure internet connections, be discrete in your sex life, and keep your dirty laundry locked away from everyone (even friends and family). If necessary, hire a therapist to vent your secrets.
Wrapping Up
No one, man or woman, has the right to initiate violence on another. In equal measure, everyone has the right to self defense. Hopefully, these methods will help round out the martial philosophy of those who anticipate conflict with women.
Too often, those involved in self defense do not completely consider their philosophical reasons for engaging in martial training in the first place. For example, I have seen a martial arts instructor advocate training to use a knife stab to the neck to address a grab from behind. The disparity of force represented here is enormous. It is this author's belief that the instructor was only allowed to advocate such a measure unchallenged because she is a woman. The reason she was not questioned is because most martial artists in this culture do not consider the reality of women's violence or their capacity to wield it. Even worse, most male martial artists do not consider the passive, more sexual ways women hurt men every day in this culture, nor do they plan to defend against those tactics. Therefore, it remains typical for women in western culture to advocate for exaggerated acts of incomprehensible violence in response to minor altercations (#killallmen is one example) and to use sexuality as an indirect form of violence (google Brigadier General Sinclair, an exemplary soldier, stripped of rank, humiliated, and disgraced by a single vindictive sex partner who demonstrably lied in court). Such behavior is now NORMAL to western women.
The majority of women do not believe they need martial training, nor do they typically need to physically protect themselves. That's because most violence is not used against, nor by, women. Criminal statistics bear this out too often to reiterate here. The primal power of women lies in sexuality, not physical aggression. With civilization stripped away, women survive through their sexuality, not their muscles. Countless conflicts throughout history demonstrate how powerful victors in war are rewarded by the women of the conquered men, often with the tacit acceptance of those women. Contemporary culture, as it decivilizes, has shown how women reward thugs and other violent men.
With respect to sexuality as a tool of violence, this author does not refer to broken hearts, cheating, and other forms of emotional wreckage. This author refers to literal VIOLENCE that is perpetrated through women's sexuality. Examples include women who encourage vengeance killings (among the poor), use the police state as a weapon against men they wish to victimize (among the middle class), advocate legislation which harms others (among the elite), and use lies and distortions to put a social bulls-eye on people they wish to harm (among all women). This author is continually shocked by those male martial artists who do not explicitly acknowledge or prepare for the violence of women, or speak out against it when it occurs. Considering what's at stake, men should learn to better resist passive female aggression.
When people picture a predatory criminal singling out a man for extortion of his money, most people mistakenly picture a male criminal, hunched over, with a weapon, who intends to commit violence unless that money is forcibly transferred. But what of the female predator who uses her vagina to accomplish the exact same outcome? A woman who will likely receive social, even political support for her robbery? This woman is every bit as dangerous and far more common than the male mugger. So how should a man protect himself from this enemy?
Fundamental Tactics to Resist Female Seduction/Aggression
Brinksmanship
Much like martial training teaches a man to absorb, redirect, and oppose increasing levels of physical force by an assailant, Venusian arts training, otherwise known as 'Game,' can help men absorb, redirect, and oppose increasing levels of seductive force by women. Though most game theorists use game for its practical outcome of scoring pussy, men can also learn to protect themselves from sexual predation through seduction resistance. The single most powerful training tool for male self defense against women is sexual brinksmanship.
Just as one can learn to effectively resist a man who uses violence to influence one's decisions, one can learn to effectively resist a woman who uses sexuality to influence one's decisions. Luckily, men in this culture have one of the most effective training tools imaginable: pornography. What is pornography but a collection of the sexiest possible women engaging in the sexiest possible behaviors to manipulate men into giving them money? By training to resist the seduction of women who are 10's, a man can theoretically resist the seductive advances of any woman he meets.
The method is simple.
1. Limit yourself to one orgasm per day. When you have this orgasm, it can be accomplished through fantasy or sex only. No pornographic pictures or videos allowed. The rest of the day, when tempted by pornography, watch freely, but spend no money, and do not orgasm. Masturbate to the point of 'throbbing' 4 times, then stop watching. Go do something productive. Repeat this process as necessary, then manually orgasm only 1 time or have sex before bed, without visual aid.
2. Visualize denying porn actresses your sperm. You are regaining control of your sperm back from women. When this becomes easy, visualize denying the women around you your sperm unless they have earned it. This will increase your confidence and reinforce a healthier attitude toward sex that values your fundamental worth as a person. You will begin to have better standards for female behavior, make better choices in relationships, and set firmer boundaries. You will also become more selective and demanding in the bedroom, an attribute psychologically healthy women will appreciate.
3. For best results in brinksmanship, use a time when your work for the day is done, or as a brief break.
4. At first, use a highly sexually charged, flirtacious softcore type of pornography which closely simulates natural female seduction. Videos of twerking, dirty talk, bodily display, and other suggestive videos are best. Masturbating to videos of penetrative sex are actually counterproductive as they encourage a man to take the subconscious role of cuckold. Eventually, you will be able to practice without visual aids using fantasy alone. At this point, you will reach a state of 'masculine presence' where attractive women stimulate you, but do not modify your behavior. If you feel inclined to ask whether you're there yet, you aren't.
At this point in your development, women you know will begin to separate into two categories: 1. Good women who sense your control, respect you, and want to earn your sperm by winning your favor, and 2. Evil women who feel entitled to your lust and will attack you for your autonomy. By increasing your sexual power in this way, you will simultaneously draw in good women and enrage evil women. Use brinksmanship to further steel yourself against manipulation by both. Both types of women will attempt to overcome your resistance in two different ways. A good woman will attempt to win your sperm and your exclusivity while an evil woman will attempt to manipulate you into giving favors and masturbatory tributes whilst simultaneously rejecting your advances and denying you access to any better women. Both types of women want your exclusive attention, but only one type will pleasure you on command and follow your lead.
Other benefits of brinksmanship include: a more satisfying and autonomous sex life, greater comfort while interacting with attractive women, a more balanced appreciation for attractive women without the predatory feelings which accompany unrestrained lust, greater feelings of bliss and peace due to a calm stream of endorphins which do not crash in the calamitous wave of orgasm, greater amounts of sperm per orgasm, harder erections, and less symptoms of erectile dysfunction in healthy men.
Distance, Preemptive Recording, and Legal Representation
When you suspect a woman has singled you out or might single you out as a social target for violence, you must react quickly using three tactics: distance, preemptive recording, and legal representation. Your financial security will influence which tactics are available to you.
If you suspect lower class violence of the vigilante sort due to false claims of rape, violated honor, etc., make any sort of distance you can from that woman. Do not answer calls, do not stay in the same city, get away. Your brinksmanship training will make this easier. Your life is in possible danger and you must react accordingly. A man does not ever fight a single woman. He fights both her and the mob of men who will do violence for her approval. No one ever asks the lynching victim for their side of the story. Simply get away. Time may disperse the mob, but they will always remember you as a social target for violence. Count your losses and leave town if you are singled out for mob violence.
If you suspect the more middle class, civilized variant of this mobbing, begin recording every interaction you have with this woman. Continue to avoid calls and interactions, but also be ready to record any attempt she makes to reinitiate contact. She will try to contact you as a means of creating conflict so she can make you seem hostile to others. Remain calm and record everything. This will help you later when she inevitably calls the police to take you away. Do not speak to the police or the woman, though you can show the police recordings as long as they do not seem likely to destroy or confiscate them. Just record everything and save it all for the courtroom.
If you suspect character assassination as a successful man, you must, whenever possible, enlist the services of an attorney. Be ready at all times to preemptively sue women who seem likely to attack your character. Make distance, record everything, and additionally hire legal counsel to financially attack predatory women who wish to harm you. At the elite level, everyone will be recording YOU as well. Make sure you enjoy your vices over secure internet connections, be discrete in your sex life, and keep your dirty laundry locked away from everyone (even friends and family). If necessary, hire a therapist to vent your secrets.
Wrapping Up
No one, man or woman, has the right to initiate violence on another. In equal measure, everyone has the right to self defense. Hopefully, these methods will help round out the martial philosophy of those who anticipate conflict with women.
Thursday, February 6, 2014
Contrast is Sexy
Virtually every human being alive in every culture entertains a variety of sexual fantasies and desires, yet almost no discussion has shed light on why certain things are sexy. This blog offers a theory which might explain the motivations of those who seek to control society. The sexiest situations are characterized by stark contrast. Large, muscular men dominating petite waifish girls generally constitutes the most common preference across cultures. However, this contrast stands opposed by an unnatural contrast: the domination of large, muscular men by petite waifish girls. This new contrast characterizes so called progressive cultures and explains their every idiosyncrasy.
In response to this amped culture of female supremacy, two exaggerated responses are possible for men. They can either double down on dominance or completely submit. There are no other options left or they lose male identity in the broader culture. For those men who double down, fetishes involve contrasts which contrast female purity and corruption. Spilling the pure seed of life in a sweet girl's dirty shithole. Tying up a warm trusting girl with cold chains in order to betray her. Punishing a girl who is innocent, kind, and gentle. For those men who submit totally, fetishes involve contrasts of male superiority and weakness. A business executive being pegged by a young intern. A financially enslaved cuckold powerlessly watching as his wife is bred by a better endowed man. A small man being abused by a large woman.
The intensity of such contrasts have a social cost. A functional society encourages limited contrast in sexual desires such that men do not need to be brutes and women do not need to be wimps nor the inverse. Healthy societies thereby encourage unity, harmony, organization, and happiness. Societies ready to die generally exhibit a more pronounced contrast in sexual fantasies and are characterized by division, aggression, chaos, and misery.
The contrasts which get a person off generally inform the totality of their personal and political views. Men who are dominant generally support right wing positions to shackle women while women who are dominant generally support left wing attempts to shackle men. The alternative to these prurient psychosexual conflicts is to disassociate one's sexuality from one's politics and way of life. Shackle only those who harm others. This is the only way of peace.
In response to this amped culture of female supremacy, two exaggerated responses are possible for men. They can either double down on dominance or completely submit. There are no other options left or they lose male identity in the broader culture. For those men who double down, fetishes involve contrasts which contrast female purity and corruption. Spilling the pure seed of life in a sweet girl's dirty shithole. Tying up a warm trusting girl with cold chains in order to betray her. Punishing a girl who is innocent, kind, and gentle. For those men who submit totally, fetishes involve contrasts of male superiority and weakness. A business executive being pegged by a young intern. A financially enslaved cuckold powerlessly watching as his wife is bred by a better endowed man. A small man being abused by a large woman.
The intensity of such contrasts have a social cost. A functional society encourages limited contrast in sexual desires such that men do not need to be brutes and women do not need to be wimps nor the inverse. Healthy societies thereby encourage unity, harmony, organization, and happiness. Societies ready to die generally exhibit a more pronounced contrast in sexual fantasies and are characterized by division, aggression, chaos, and misery.
The contrasts which get a person off generally inform the totality of their personal and political views. Men who are dominant generally support right wing positions to shackle women while women who are dominant generally support left wing attempts to shackle men. The alternative to these prurient psychosexual conflicts is to disassociate one's sexuality from one's politics and way of life. Shackle only those who harm others. This is the only way of peace.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Love: The Female Weapon
As a martial artist, the question of gender raises a contentious discussion about the proper way of dealing with women and conflict. Men tend to underestimate female aggression, just as women tend to overestimate male aggression. Almost none of the conflicts between men and women will be physical because every woman is capable of soliciting immediate help from men during violent conflict. Any man who strikes a woman faces a potentially lethal battle with multiple men. Rather, most gender conflict will be passive aggressive battle designed to socially undermine. As in most things, most females will use their vaginas to prevail. An important lesson for male martial artists is to never physically fight a woman, not because she is deserving of special protection, but because every woman is as strong as the men willing to fight for her favor.
One of feminism's most odious lies is the notion that misogyny or hatred of women is a ruling force of western civilization. In actuality, the exact opposite tendency, philogyny or love of women, has characterized virtually all male interaction with women. Western men have become so blindly affectionate toward women that every female fault is overlooked and every merit exaggerated. Any misbehavior of a female up to and including murder is permissible, provided that a criminal woman shows sufficient contrition. Meanwhile, mundane daily activities (such as work, home, childcare) are transformed into exalted achievements as soon as women undertake them.
This situation is almost entirely dependent on men who are so fearful of losing mere social contact with women that they will forgive even blatantly despicable behavior while praising mundane behavior. A cultural princess complex is the result. The solution is for men to take charge of their own power over women and set fair boundaries of conduct that apply to all people, regardless of sex. Further, if women violate these boundaries, a man must be perpetually willing to walk away. This is the only solution to the decline of the western social order.
The use of sexual power over men begins earlier than puberty when the expectations of young girls are reinforced by their fathers. A woman raised by a strong father learns fair boundaries and unwavering standards of conduct. A woman raised by a weak father who is dominated by her mother learns to take advantage of male leniency in all subsequent relationships as well as becoming more inclined to aggress against women who are less manipulative. This aggressive tendency is a result of the sexual game that manipulative women play to maximize their power over others which might be described as a sexual trade union: either a man plays the game, or women go on strike and refuse to have sex with that man. Monogamous, principled women undermine the game of these vile women by allowing men access to guaranteed sex without manipulation in exchange for commitment. They are the scabs who break the strike. As soon as men learn that sex is possible without constant female manipulation, it means game over for the sexual trade union, hence the rabid anger of bitchy women toward monogamy, fairness, and kindness as feminine characteristics.
Male weakness is the greatest frustration of men who oppose the sexual trade union. Most men intuitively understand that women wish to control their lives, but take no constructive steps to set acceptable compromises which enable healthy relationships. The only solution is for weak men to develop a resistance to the cultural inundation of sexual stimuli and learn to evaluate women on a more principled basis than whether they elicit a stiffy. This can be practically accomplished through tantric practices of orgasm control, meditation, and exposing oneself to austerity. By becoming more resistant to female manipulation, strong men will find that female behavior is instantly improved in their presence, much to the chagrin of sexual trade unionists and weak men. By controlling his own desire and cultivating a willingness to walk away from fucked up women, a man gains true power over women and defeats the sexual trade union.
This is possible as long as men control a key aspect of sexual fulfillment: commitment. While women hold access to sex itself and choose their studs accordingly, men hold access to commitment and choose their wives accordingly. No marriage should be possible without male consent just as no sex should be possible without female consent. Even in the midst of a massive divorce industry and a toxic culture of female self congratulation and male coercion, men still decide whether to commit. Men must leverage this choice as a way of balancing the female drive for social control.
To men contemplating conflict with a woman, strive above all else to remove the possibility of physical violence while leveraging your indifference to beauty and willingness to walk away. This is the only practical way to survive conflict with females while maintaining firm control over the manner and circumstances of one's own death.
One of feminism's most odious lies is the notion that misogyny or hatred of women is a ruling force of western civilization. In actuality, the exact opposite tendency, philogyny or love of women, has characterized virtually all male interaction with women. Western men have become so blindly affectionate toward women that every female fault is overlooked and every merit exaggerated. Any misbehavior of a female up to and including murder is permissible, provided that a criminal woman shows sufficient contrition. Meanwhile, mundane daily activities (such as work, home, childcare) are transformed into exalted achievements as soon as women undertake them.
This situation is almost entirely dependent on men who are so fearful of losing mere social contact with women that they will forgive even blatantly despicable behavior while praising mundane behavior. A cultural princess complex is the result. The solution is for men to take charge of their own power over women and set fair boundaries of conduct that apply to all people, regardless of sex. Further, if women violate these boundaries, a man must be perpetually willing to walk away. This is the only solution to the decline of the western social order.
The use of sexual power over men begins earlier than puberty when the expectations of young girls are reinforced by their fathers. A woman raised by a strong father learns fair boundaries and unwavering standards of conduct. A woman raised by a weak father who is dominated by her mother learns to take advantage of male leniency in all subsequent relationships as well as becoming more inclined to aggress against women who are less manipulative. This aggressive tendency is a result of the sexual game that manipulative women play to maximize their power over others which might be described as a sexual trade union: either a man plays the game, or women go on strike and refuse to have sex with that man. Monogamous, principled women undermine the game of these vile women by allowing men access to guaranteed sex without manipulation in exchange for commitment. They are the scabs who break the strike. As soon as men learn that sex is possible without constant female manipulation, it means game over for the sexual trade union, hence the rabid anger of bitchy women toward monogamy, fairness, and kindness as feminine characteristics.
Male weakness is the greatest frustration of men who oppose the sexual trade union. Most men intuitively understand that women wish to control their lives, but take no constructive steps to set acceptable compromises which enable healthy relationships. The only solution is for weak men to develop a resistance to the cultural inundation of sexual stimuli and learn to evaluate women on a more principled basis than whether they elicit a stiffy. This can be practically accomplished through tantric practices of orgasm control, meditation, and exposing oneself to austerity. By becoming more resistant to female manipulation, strong men will find that female behavior is instantly improved in their presence, much to the chagrin of sexual trade unionists and weak men. By controlling his own desire and cultivating a willingness to walk away from fucked up women, a man gains true power over women and defeats the sexual trade union.
This is possible as long as men control a key aspect of sexual fulfillment: commitment. While women hold access to sex itself and choose their studs accordingly, men hold access to commitment and choose their wives accordingly. No marriage should be possible without male consent just as no sex should be possible without female consent. Even in the midst of a massive divorce industry and a toxic culture of female self congratulation and male coercion, men still decide whether to commit. Men must leverage this choice as a way of balancing the female drive for social control.
To men contemplating conflict with a woman, strive above all else to remove the possibility of physical violence while leveraging your indifference to beauty and willingness to walk away. This is the only practical way to survive conflict with females while maintaining firm control over the manner and circumstances of one's own death.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Conflicts of Reproductive Strategy
The two types of reproductive strategy mentioned in the previous post are not pure types, and many variations persist in day to day social life. For example, though the modern American leftist follows an r-selecting strategy, they actually reproduce less often than traditional families. What gives?
This owes to a dissonance between one's preferred ideology and one's way of life. The modern leftist, when they are losers of the mating game (read: fatties, uggs, etc.) will often adopt r-selecting philosophies as a way of attacking the indifferent mating game which has scorned them. Rather than seeking r-selection as a reproductive strategy, they seek it as vengeance against those who produce excess and win the mating game (read: married people, K-selecting communities). Therefore, these individuals share common political ground with r-selecting collectives, and though they will not be welcome at any r-selecting orgies, they long for the day when they can deplete K-selecting excesses and destroy the happy families they were denied by the zero sum mating game. These individuals are therefore among the most wretched in society, as they do not steal resources to reproduce themselves but to prevent the K-selecting reproduction of others as a malicious act. This explains the abundance of r-selecting leftists who are unlikely to have children, or actively hate children to the extent of reflexively aborting them. They aren't supporting an ideology to pursue happiness in their own lives, but to spread hate for other people's lives. The best way to deal with such individuals is to seal them out of one's life, avoid them, or destroy them.
This owes to a dissonance between one's preferred ideology and one's way of life. The modern leftist, when they are losers of the mating game (read: fatties, uggs, etc.) will often adopt r-selecting philosophies as a way of attacking the indifferent mating game which has scorned them. Rather than seeking r-selection as a reproductive strategy, they seek it as vengeance against those who produce excess and win the mating game (read: married people, K-selecting communities). Therefore, these individuals share common political ground with r-selecting collectives, and though they will not be welcome at any r-selecting orgies, they long for the day when they can deplete K-selecting excesses and destroy the happy families they were denied by the zero sum mating game. These individuals are therefore among the most wretched in society, as they do not steal resources to reproduce themselves but to prevent the K-selecting reproduction of others as a malicious act. This explains the abundance of r-selecting leftists who are unlikely to have children, or actively hate children to the extent of reflexively aborting them. They aren't supporting an ideology to pursue happiness in their own lives, but to spread hate for other people's lives. The best way to deal with such individuals is to seal them out of one's life, avoid them, or destroy them.
K-selected and r-selected Reproduction Strategies: Sex and Civilization
This blog, despite its martial focus, maintains a scientific philosophy. In other words, only observable, quantifiable events are relevant to discussion of the martial way. If it can't be seen and counted, it doesn't matter to our analysis.
As mentioned previously, sex is a topic which has generated particular disharmony due to its zero sum nature. Only one man's genes can be transmitted by one woman in each birth. This relation inevitably results in winners and losers of the mating game. In other words, the act of reproduction itself is inherently both sexist and unequal, because the acts of penetration, birth, and ejaculation all imply exclusive and immutable gender roles. This dissatisfaction is further complicated by different strategies of reproduction.
All political conflicts surrounding sex relate to the fluidity of reproduction strategies unique to the human species. Just as human beings can change their fighting style from Tiger to Crane Kenpo depending on strategy, mating strategies are flexible. Such fluidity is acquired through verbal behavior, which enables human beings to alter their responses to direct contingencies by responding to verbal rules acquired indirectly through interactions with other humans. In ecological terms, two reproductive strategies are relevant to understanding human sexual politics: K-selected strategies or carrying capacity selection, and r-selected strategies or quantity selection.
r-selected reproduction consists of producing an excess of offspring above and beyond the carrying capacity for the species, or the maximum number of a species which can be sustained indefinitely in a given environment. Each individual offspring has a correspondingly low probability of surviving to reproduce. Examples of species which instinctively follow this strategy include rodents, insects, and other organisms which survive through quantity of life rather than quality of life. Characteristics of these species include physical smallness, great fecundity or sexual excess, promiscuity, mobility, short lives, and above all, minimal investment in offspring. In these species, it is acceptable for the majority of offspring to die, so long as the lineage continues.
K-selected reproduction consists of producing a relative few offspring well below carrying capacity, each of which has a relatively high probability of surviving to reproduce. Examples of instinctively K-selected species include whales, elephants, and other organisms which invest greatly in the quality of offspring. Characteristics include physical size and development, limited sexuality and sometimes monogamy, tendency to occupy a home area or birthing area, long lives, and maximal investment in offspring. These species create offspring with a high probability of reproduction per individual.
These typographies are messy when applied across species, as some species such as sea turtles blend the two categories by reproducing in excess, investing minimally, followed by long living offspring with a high chance of reproduction. The picture becomes even more complicated when applied to humans, who can change reproduction strategies depending on verbal rules.
Human communities are the ultimate result of human reproductive strategies, and the type of strategy adopted will result in characteristic outcomes which can be seen across human history.
r-selecting communities tend to select quantity of children over quality of childhood. Communities of these sorts tend to replace nuclear families with loose associations of peers who control sex, the raising of children, and the mobility of the group. These peer groups are ever expanding and individuals within the groups see themselves as cosmopolitans, inviting diverse individuals who all feast at the same sexual smorgasbord. As well, these collectivities are not geographically confined, but consist of nomads who roam across borders and have no respect for national or family affiliations. These collectivities tend toward matriarchy as a rule, placing children in the care of promiscuous mothers, who invite a revolving door of male suitors, any of whom could be a father, depending on her ovulation cycle. Instead of men competing for mates and investing in offspring, they play a game of chance with their genes and raise all children in common with the rest of the group. Therefore, father involvement is replaced with community child rearing. Violence is an inevitable outcome of this strategy, particularly when limited resources result in vicious competition. Because r-selecting communities do not need to value private property, frugality, and individual rights, they deplete the resources of their communities until all members are left fighting over leftovers. This depletion takes the form of government welfare, money from K-selecting parents, donations, robbery, and other means of extracting money without contributing to one's society. Examples of the r-selecting strategy are evident in the American underclass of perpetual welfare recipients, Burning Man "burners," gang members, free wheeling hippies, unemployed drifters, drug users, Gypsies, radical anarchic communes, and other groups where easy sex, zero responsibility, low parent investment, and parasitic income are the norms.
The advantages of r-selection become evident during times of social uncertainty, violence, and poverty where investing in offspring is impossible or highly punished by a changing, hostile environment which kills a large proportion of individual organisms. In these times, producing a surplus of children can increase the odds of species continuation, even if every individual child lives a short, brutal, competitive life. r-selected individuals tend to criticize K-selected individuals as arrogant, exclusive, snobby, elitist, suckers, and other terms relating to over-investment in family and children and underinvestment in communal sex and hedonism. In the defense of r-selecting culture, the sex is better and more various, even if a relative few individuals are able to enjoy it.
K-selecting communities, in contrast to r-selecting communities, select quality of childhood over number of children. The nuclear family becomes the default social structure for raising children and sex is controlled by family marriage arrangements. These groups are inherently exclusive, seeking to maximize the resources available to guarantee a high standard of living for all offspring in a limited area. As such, creation of a surplus of resources is valued more highly than the act of sex, which occurs at a later age after resource accumulation in the form of education and earned income has already begun. Sex is enjoyed in the context of a monogamous relationship for the ultimate purpose of creating and investing in offspring. Patriarchy is the norm, which results in a culture of male achievement and pursuance of respect to attract a single, high quality woman and compete vigorously with other males for exclusive sexual access. Monogamous marriage is seen as the traditional ending to this competition which is traditionally followed by offspring who are given a surplus of resources to help secure their healthy and happy childhoods. Each child is likely to reproduce, but may come to feel entitled to their parents' surplus wealth, resulting in a shift to an r-selecting reproductive strategy during puberty if the family does not teach the value of the K-selecting reproductive strategy which produced the surplus in the first place. Therefore, gratitude and ingratitude relate directly to reproductive strategies and socialization. Examples of K-selecting societies include Western families, Oriental families, Jewish families, and other traditional structures of lineage and inheritance.
The advantages of K-selection are seen in times of excess, when every individual is guaranteed a high chance of reproductive success and a correspondingly high quality of life. The downside to this strategy is the inevitable boredom and ennui which accompany stable patterns of reinforcement, however this boredom may be preferred by those who have experienced the chaos and dehumanization common to r-selecting groups. K-selecting individuals tend to criticize r-selecting types as uncivilized, crude, vicious, undiscriminating, irresponsible, ungrateful, and libertine.
The two types of sexual selection strategies result in characteristic body types with martial relevance. r-selecting martial artists tend to be physically underdeveloped and dependent on tricks to achieve victory. As such, they will be advantaged in wind, water, and other soft arts. K-selecting martial artists, due to physical development of muscular strength and endurance, tend to be advantaged in fire, earth, and other hard martial arts for direct confrontations.
With respect to the martial way, K-selecting cultures are preferred, as the martial way involves dedicating resources to one's personal development, irrespective of sex. For young men, martial arts take the form of competition with other men to attain the attention of high value females. For older men and married men, martial arts take the form of protecting what one has invested from r-selecting individuals who might seek to deplete resources. For r-selecting individuals, the martial arts take the single form of being more efficient at stealing the resources of others and avoiding justice. Whatever one's preferred role, the martial arts are a powerful tool to achieve one's goals.
Ultimately, the tension between r and K-selection is as old as human verbal behavior and will dictate the best ways for a warrior to proceed in choosing the manner of their own death.
As mentioned previously, sex is a topic which has generated particular disharmony due to its zero sum nature. Only one man's genes can be transmitted by one woman in each birth. This relation inevitably results in winners and losers of the mating game. In other words, the act of reproduction itself is inherently both sexist and unequal, because the acts of penetration, birth, and ejaculation all imply exclusive and immutable gender roles. This dissatisfaction is further complicated by different strategies of reproduction.
All political conflicts surrounding sex relate to the fluidity of reproduction strategies unique to the human species. Just as human beings can change their fighting style from Tiger to Crane Kenpo depending on strategy, mating strategies are flexible. Such fluidity is acquired through verbal behavior, which enables human beings to alter their responses to direct contingencies by responding to verbal rules acquired indirectly through interactions with other humans. In ecological terms, two reproductive strategies are relevant to understanding human sexual politics: K-selected strategies or carrying capacity selection, and r-selected strategies or quantity selection.
r-selected reproduction consists of producing an excess of offspring above and beyond the carrying capacity for the species, or the maximum number of a species which can be sustained indefinitely in a given environment. Each individual offspring has a correspondingly low probability of surviving to reproduce. Examples of species which instinctively follow this strategy include rodents, insects, and other organisms which survive through quantity of life rather than quality of life. Characteristics of these species include physical smallness, great fecundity or sexual excess, promiscuity, mobility, short lives, and above all, minimal investment in offspring. In these species, it is acceptable for the majority of offspring to die, so long as the lineage continues.
K-selected reproduction consists of producing a relative few offspring well below carrying capacity, each of which has a relatively high probability of surviving to reproduce. Examples of instinctively K-selected species include whales, elephants, and other organisms which invest greatly in the quality of offspring. Characteristics include physical size and development, limited sexuality and sometimes monogamy, tendency to occupy a home area or birthing area, long lives, and maximal investment in offspring. These species create offspring with a high probability of reproduction per individual.
These typographies are messy when applied across species, as some species such as sea turtles blend the two categories by reproducing in excess, investing minimally, followed by long living offspring with a high chance of reproduction. The picture becomes even more complicated when applied to humans, who can change reproduction strategies depending on verbal rules.
Human communities are the ultimate result of human reproductive strategies, and the type of strategy adopted will result in characteristic outcomes which can be seen across human history.
r-selecting communities tend to select quantity of children over quality of childhood. Communities of these sorts tend to replace nuclear families with loose associations of peers who control sex, the raising of children, and the mobility of the group. These peer groups are ever expanding and individuals within the groups see themselves as cosmopolitans, inviting diverse individuals who all feast at the same sexual smorgasbord. As well, these collectivities are not geographically confined, but consist of nomads who roam across borders and have no respect for national or family affiliations. These collectivities tend toward matriarchy as a rule, placing children in the care of promiscuous mothers, who invite a revolving door of male suitors, any of whom could be a father, depending on her ovulation cycle. Instead of men competing for mates and investing in offspring, they play a game of chance with their genes and raise all children in common with the rest of the group. Therefore, father involvement is replaced with community child rearing. Violence is an inevitable outcome of this strategy, particularly when limited resources result in vicious competition. Because r-selecting communities do not need to value private property, frugality, and individual rights, they deplete the resources of their communities until all members are left fighting over leftovers. This depletion takes the form of government welfare, money from K-selecting parents, donations, robbery, and other means of extracting money without contributing to one's society. Examples of the r-selecting strategy are evident in the American underclass of perpetual welfare recipients, Burning Man "burners," gang members, free wheeling hippies, unemployed drifters, drug users, Gypsies, radical anarchic communes, and other groups where easy sex, zero responsibility, low parent investment, and parasitic income are the norms.
The advantages of r-selection become evident during times of social uncertainty, violence, and poverty where investing in offspring is impossible or highly punished by a changing, hostile environment which kills a large proportion of individual organisms. In these times, producing a surplus of children can increase the odds of species continuation, even if every individual child lives a short, brutal, competitive life. r-selected individuals tend to criticize K-selected individuals as arrogant, exclusive, snobby, elitist, suckers, and other terms relating to over-investment in family and children and underinvestment in communal sex and hedonism. In the defense of r-selecting culture, the sex is better and more various, even if a relative few individuals are able to enjoy it.
K-selecting communities, in contrast to r-selecting communities, select quality of childhood over number of children. The nuclear family becomes the default social structure for raising children and sex is controlled by family marriage arrangements. These groups are inherently exclusive, seeking to maximize the resources available to guarantee a high standard of living for all offspring in a limited area. As such, creation of a surplus of resources is valued more highly than the act of sex, which occurs at a later age after resource accumulation in the form of education and earned income has already begun. Sex is enjoyed in the context of a monogamous relationship for the ultimate purpose of creating and investing in offspring. Patriarchy is the norm, which results in a culture of male achievement and pursuance of respect to attract a single, high quality woman and compete vigorously with other males for exclusive sexual access. Monogamous marriage is seen as the traditional ending to this competition which is traditionally followed by offspring who are given a surplus of resources to help secure their healthy and happy childhoods. Each child is likely to reproduce, but may come to feel entitled to their parents' surplus wealth, resulting in a shift to an r-selecting reproductive strategy during puberty if the family does not teach the value of the K-selecting reproductive strategy which produced the surplus in the first place. Therefore, gratitude and ingratitude relate directly to reproductive strategies and socialization. Examples of K-selecting societies include Western families, Oriental families, Jewish families, and other traditional structures of lineage and inheritance.
The advantages of K-selection are seen in times of excess, when every individual is guaranteed a high chance of reproductive success and a correspondingly high quality of life. The downside to this strategy is the inevitable boredom and ennui which accompany stable patterns of reinforcement, however this boredom may be preferred by those who have experienced the chaos and dehumanization common to r-selecting groups. K-selecting individuals tend to criticize r-selecting types as uncivilized, crude, vicious, undiscriminating, irresponsible, ungrateful, and libertine.
The two types of sexual selection strategies result in characteristic body types with martial relevance. r-selecting martial artists tend to be physically underdeveloped and dependent on tricks to achieve victory. As such, they will be advantaged in wind, water, and other soft arts. K-selecting martial artists, due to physical development of muscular strength and endurance, tend to be advantaged in fire, earth, and other hard martial arts for direct confrontations.
With respect to the martial way, K-selecting cultures are preferred, as the martial way involves dedicating resources to one's personal development, irrespective of sex. For young men, martial arts take the form of competition with other men to attain the attention of high value females. For older men and married men, martial arts take the form of protecting what one has invested from r-selecting individuals who might seek to deplete resources. For r-selecting individuals, the martial arts take the single form of being more efficient at stealing the resources of others and avoiding justice. Whatever one's preferred role, the martial arts are a powerful tool to achieve one's goals.
Ultimately, the tension between r and K-selection is as old as human verbal behavior and will dictate the best ways for a warrior to proceed in choosing the manner of their own death.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Desire: Destroyer or a Creator?
Human desire is a loaded topic as everyone's individual desire is ultimately their guide for action. These desires in a martial sense are to be controlled, as only a tamed desire can allow one to choose the manner of their own death. Those who cause the most damage to themselves and others while dying most violently have little or no impulse control, nor have they found ways to sublimate their desire in healthy ways.
The martial artist treats desire as something to be neither restrained nor unleashed. Rather, desire is to be guided toward satisfactions that maximize individual and collective benefit. Why care about the desires of the collective? Because the rest of society can become a powerful enemy. Therefore, the martial way is to satisfy all one's desires in ways that maximize control over one's manner of death.
The most loaded sort of desire is sexual due to the purely self serving nature of the act. Either one's genes are spread or they go to waste. Sex is not fair, nor kind, nor good, nor bad. Like killing, it is a neutral act until it yields good or bad consequences. Sex can accomplish one of two directives: destruction or creation.
Scumbags and schneevies delight in the destructive sexual desires. The divine Marquis de Sade details these desires in his works, such as 120 Days of Sodom, which is a textbook description of the motivations which plague the lives of scumbags and schneevies, driving them to depths of depravity unimaginable to civilized persons. People such as these revel in nonreproductive and destructive sexual acts, such as sodomy, cuckoldry, torture, coprophagia, pedophilia, zoophilia, and other aberrant fixations rightly condemned by almost every civilization. These fixations greatly influence the life goals of these individuals making them sadistic, masochistic, and generally unpleasant to others. Often schneevies and scumbags will get in relationships with one another predicated on mutual victimization. As long as they are arguing, fighting, hurting, and betraying one another, they remain "happy." People who harbor these fixations tend to represent cowardice, androgyny, disloyalty, and dishonesty in their dealings with others. Their life paths usually foster destruction and dissatisfaction.
What distinguishes good people from schneevies are not the nature of their sexual desires, but their means of channeling these desires in civilized ways. A grown man who finds young girls attractive might role play with his wife. An anal sex fixation might be enjoyed in the context of a committed relationship. A sadist might play with whips and implement a safe word for their partner. In all cases, sexual exclusivity, loyalty, and reliability are hallmarks of civilized people who CREATE with their sexual desires rather than destroy. They create relationships, families, and communities, even if they might harbor kinky desires behind closed doors. By channeling their desires, rather than being consumed by them, they create a greater community around them. Further, these individuals do not treat their desires as the primary foci of their lives. They define themselves by what they create and accomplish, rather than what gets them off.
Further posts will discuss ways of channeling and controlling desire for constructive ends.
The martial artist treats desire as something to be neither restrained nor unleashed. Rather, desire is to be guided toward satisfactions that maximize individual and collective benefit. Why care about the desires of the collective? Because the rest of society can become a powerful enemy. Therefore, the martial way is to satisfy all one's desires in ways that maximize control over one's manner of death.
The most loaded sort of desire is sexual due to the purely self serving nature of the act. Either one's genes are spread or they go to waste. Sex is not fair, nor kind, nor good, nor bad. Like killing, it is a neutral act until it yields good or bad consequences. Sex can accomplish one of two directives: destruction or creation.
Scumbags and schneevies delight in the destructive sexual desires. The divine Marquis de Sade details these desires in his works, such as 120 Days of Sodom, which is a textbook description of the motivations which plague the lives of scumbags and schneevies, driving them to depths of depravity unimaginable to civilized persons. People such as these revel in nonreproductive and destructive sexual acts, such as sodomy, cuckoldry, torture, coprophagia, pedophilia, zoophilia, and other aberrant fixations rightly condemned by almost every civilization. These fixations greatly influence the life goals of these individuals making them sadistic, masochistic, and generally unpleasant to others. Often schneevies and scumbags will get in relationships with one another predicated on mutual victimization. As long as they are arguing, fighting, hurting, and betraying one another, they remain "happy." People who harbor these fixations tend to represent cowardice, androgyny, disloyalty, and dishonesty in their dealings with others. Their life paths usually foster destruction and dissatisfaction.
What distinguishes good people from schneevies are not the nature of their sexual desires, but their means of channeling these desires in civilized ways. A grown man who finds young girls attractive might role play with his wife. An anal sex fixation might be enjoyed in the context of a committed relationship. A sadist might play with whips and implement a safe word for their partner. In all cases, sexual exclusivity, loyalty, and reliability are hallmarks of civilized people who CREATE with their sexual desires rather than destroy. They create relationships, families, and communities, even if they might harbor kinky desires behind closed doors. By channeling their desires, rather than being consumed by them, they create a greater community around them. Further, these individuals do not treat their desires as the primary foci of their lives. They define themselves by what they create and accomplish, rather than what gets them off.
Further posts will discuss ways of channeling and controlling desire for constructive ends.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Civilization as a Martial Endeavor
To the layperson, the task of civilization seems to constitute a finite effort with a clearly defined endpoint. This illusion stems from the physical manifestations of civilized human interaction such as roads, buildings, transportation methods, and tools. However, these objects are mere relics of the behavioral and martial origins of civilization. To achieve a civilization requires 2 elements: control of sexuality and control of violence.
These preconditions are mutually dependent. When sexuality runs amok, violence follows. For example, consider how criminal violence seems to parasitically accompany prostitution. In equal measure, when violence is widespread, sexuality is unhinged. Consider any war zone where a country's men are killed off and their women raped. Soldiers who can kill at ease need not respect social control of sexuality. When a society loses control of sexuality, its means of reproduction, including reproduction of socially important ideas and habits, is compromised.
The process of civilization is an inherently gendered effort due to the roles played by men and women in the means of reproducing people and ideas. Women act as gatekeepers who hold the social responsibility of choosing fathers and giving birth. Men act as supporters in the birthing process and assume a crucial later role in civilizing their children by transmitting ideas and habits which enable them to best control violence and sexuality in their own lives. This cycle either repeats across generations or is interrupted, leading to the original state of nature where violence and sexuality are unrestrained.
Maintaining the enterprise of civilization requires both women and men of autonomy. The herd takes comfort in the state of nature leaving the weakest to fend for themselves against merciless death and suffering. Women and men who can live separately from the herd, control their own sexual selection, and refine their responses to violence are able to transcend the state of nature to engage in productive behavior which creates all the physical manifestations of civilization: from the wheel to the rocket ship.
In women, civilization is best expressed through the selection of appropriate fathers for their children. You can judge a woman's savagery by the quality of her mates. Women who seek out and copulate with drug users and deadbeats are savages who will produce unsuccessful offspring. They are actively choosing a society of greater violence and promiscuity by rewarding and reproducing men who are impulsively violent and ultimately carrying children who will repeat this cycle. Women who seek out and copulate with men who invest in future generations are forces of civilization. They ensure that their children will be shown civilized conduct and educated in ways that accentuate autonomy and strength.
In men, civilization is best expressed through control of violence, which requires martial strength and bravery. This does not mean a proclivity to engage in violence, but to neutralize conflict. Men who use aggression to force the compliance of others are savages. Men who can anticipate, prevent, and neutralize violence are forces of civilization. At the physical level, this demands fighting ability. At the verbal level, this requires diplomacy. Both are necessary attributes of a man with the strength to maintain and transmit civilization. You can judge a man by his awareness, will, and skill in conflict.
This post should reflect that civilization is not a 'thing' in the objectified sense, but is an ongoing pattern of behavior between women and men. Walking the martial way can help people of both genders to fulfill their roles in reducing conflict and developing their self control to become forces of civilization strong enough to persist across generations.
These preconditions are mutually dependent. When sexuality runs amok, violence follows. For example, consider how criminal violence seems to parasitically accompany prostitution. In equal measure, when violence is widespread, sexuality is unhinged. Consider any war zone where a country's men are killed off and their women raped. Soldiers who can kill at ease need not respect social control of sexuality. When a society loses control of sexuality, its means of reproduction, including reproduction of socially important ideas and habits, is compromised.
The process of civilization is an inherently gendered effort due to the roles played by men and women in the means of reproducing people and ideas. Women act as gatekeepers who hold the social responsibility of choosing fathers and giving birth. Men act as supporters in the birthing process and assume a crucial later role in civilizing their children by transmitting ideas and habits which enable them to best control violence and sexuality in their own lives. This cycle either repeats across generations or is interrupted, leading to the original state of nature where violence and sexuality are unrestrained.
Maintaining the enterprise of civilization requires both women and men of autonomy. The herd takes comfort in the state of nature leaving the weakest to fend for themselves against merciless death and suffering. Women and men who can live separately from the herd, control their own sexual selection, and refine their responses to violence are able to transcend the state of nature to engage in productive behavior which creates all the physical manifestations of civilization: from the wheel to the rocket ship.
In women, civilization is best expressed through the selection of appropriate fathers for their children. You can judge a woman's savagery by the quality of her mates. Women who seek out and copulate with drug users and deadbeats are savages who will produce unsuccessful offspring. They are actively choosing a society of greater violence and promiscuity by rewarding and reproducing men who are impulsively violent and ultimately carrying children who will repeat this cycle. Women who seek out and copulate with men who invest in future generations are forces of civilization. They ensure that their children will be shown civilized conduct and educated in ways that accentuate autonomy and strength.
In men, civilization is best expressed through control of violence, which requires martial strength and bravery. This does not mean a proclivity to engage in violence, but to neutralize conflict. Men who use aggression to force the compliance of others are savages. Men who can anticipate, prevent, and neutralize violence are forces of civilization. At the physical level, this demands fighting ability. At the verbal level, this requires diplomacy. Both are necessary attributes of a man with the strength to maintain and transmit civilization. You can judge a man by his awareness, will, and skill in conflict.
This post should reflect that civilization is not a 'thing' in the objectified sense, but is an ongoing pattern of behavior between women and men. Walking the martial way can help people of both genders to fulfill their roles in reducing conflict and developing their self control to become forces of civilization strong enough to persist across generations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)