As a martial artist, the question of gender raises a contentious discussion about the proper way of dealing with women and conflict. Men tend to underestimate female aggression, just as women tend to overestimate male aggression. Almost none of the conflicts between men and women will be physical because every woman is capable of soliciting immediate help from men during violent conflict. Any man who strikes a woman faces a potentially lethal battle with multiple men. Rather, most gender conflict will be passive aggressive battle designed to socially undermine. As in most things, most females will use their vaginas to prevail. An important lesson for male martial artists is to never physically fight a woman, not because she is deserving of special protection, but because every woman is as strong as the men willing to fight for her favor.
One of feminism's most odious lies is the notion that misogyny or hatred of women is a ruling force of western civilization. In actuality, the exact opposite tendency, philogyny or love of women, has characterized virtually all male interaction with women. Western men have become so blindly affectionate toward women that every female fault is overlooked and every merit exaggerated. Any misbehavior of a female up to and including murder is permissible, provided that a criminal woman shows sufficient contrition. Meanwhile, mundane daily activities (such as work, home, childcare) are transformed into exalted achievements as soon as women undertake them.
This situation is almost entirely dependent on men who are so fearful of losing mere social contact with women that they will forgive even blatantly despicable behavior while praising mundane behavior. A cultural princess complex is the result. The solution is for men to take charge of their own power over women and set fair boundaries of conduct that apply to all people, regardless of sex. Further, if women violate these boundaries, a man must be perpetually willing to walk away. This is the only solution to the decline of the western social order.
The use of sexual power over men begins earlier than puberty when the expectations of young girls are reinforced by their fathers. A woman raised by a strong father learns fair boundaries and unwavering standards of conduct. A woman raised by a weak father who is dominated by her mother learns to take advantage of male leniency in all subsequent relationships as well as becoming more inclined to aggress against women who are less manipulative. This aggressive tendency is a result of the sexual game that manipulative women play to maximize their power over others which might be described as a sexual trade union: either a man plays the game, or women go on strike and refuse to have sex with that man. Monogamous, principled women undermine the game of these vile women by allowing men access to guaranteed sex without manipulation in exchange for commitment. They are the scabs who break the strike. As soon as men learn that sex is possible without constant female manipulation, it means game over for the sexual trade union, hence the rabid anger of bitchy women toward monogamy, fairness, and kindness as feminine characteristics.
Male weakness is the greatest frustration of men who oppose the sexual trade union. Most men intuitively understand that women wish to control their lives, but take no constructive steps to set acceptable compromises which enable healthy relationships. The only solution is for weak men to develop a resistance to the cultural inundation of sexual stimuli and learn to evaluate women on a more principled basis than whether they elicit a stiffy. This can be practically accomplished through tantric practices of orgasm control, meditation, and exposing oneself to austerity. By becoming more resistant to female manipulation, strong men will find that female behavior is instantly improved in their presence, much to the chagrin of sexual trade unionists and weak men. By controlling his own desire and cultivating a willingness to walk away from fucked up women, a man gains true power over women and defeats the sexual trade union.
This is possible as long as men control a key aspect of sexual fulfillment: commitment. While women hold access to sex itself and choose their studs accordingly, men hold access to commitment and choose their wives accordingly. No marriage should be possible without male consent just as no sex should be possible without female consent. Even in the midst of a massive divorce industry and a toxic culture of female self congratulation and male coercion, men still decide whether to commit. Men must leverage this choice as a way of balancing the female drive for social control.
To men contemplating conflict with a woman, strive above all else to remove the possibility of physical violence while leveraging your indifference to beauty and willingness to walk away. This is the only practical way to survive conflict with females while maintaining firm control over the manner and circumstances of one's own death.
No comments:
Post a Comment